supernova1324;1981091 said:This is ridiculous. HOW CAN YOU COMPARE TWO BANDS OF COMPLETELY DIFFERENT GENRES?!?!?!
metallica_attack_13;1981107 said:Technically, they're both considered rock. Aerosmith is just heavier. That being said, I prefer Journey. Don't Stop Believin' is the greatest song ever. Period.
metallica_attack_13;1981107 said:Technically, they're both considered rock. Aerosmith is just heavier. That being said, I prefer Journey. Don't Stop Believin' is the greatest song ever. Comma.
Insane3;1981127 said:I fixed it for you.
supernova1324;1981139 said:LOL you spelled comma wrong.
Insane3;1981159 said:I'm now gonna use my ultimate excuse:I'M FRENCH!Is coma the word for a state of kind of sleep?
Gowienczyk;1981200 said:Arena Rock (Journey) isn't so different as 70s rock (Aerosmith). Don't act like this guy is comparing a pop and noise band. Not completely different.
supernova1324;1981215 said:The sound that each band produces hardly sounds alike though. How does Don't Stop Believing sound like Walk This Way?
supernova1324;1981124 said:Technically, Linkin Par and The Who are both rock, does that make them comparable?
Quinarvy;2003138 said:Aerosmith because nothing beats Sweet Emotion built into a ****ing Roller Coaster.
WingsOfSteel;2004728 said:Yes."The Who is a much better band than Linkin Park is," is a comparison, hence they are comparable. QED.
Gowienczyk;1981247 said:Aerosmith always came off as a bad Rolling Stones clone to me.
ArmsAreLoud;2006110 said:They didn't really; they just did it "best". Led Zeppelin was not even close to innovating the genre in any way, either.I happen to adore both bands, but I prefer Aerosmith.