DanB91;2876549 said:but the thing is, these songs are done by peer review. Many people might think a plain guitar solo won't cut it for the standards RBN is trying to hold. I wouldn't and I am seriously thinking of reviewing songs myself.I would suggest at least having a drum machine in the background. Having someone actually playing the drums that doesn't do the same rhythm over and over again (add in fills) would be preferable.
LyokoFreaks;2877568 said:That's not how it's going to work, though. You can NOT judge ANY songs in peer review based upon YOUR opinion of what is a standard format for a song. I just wanna make this perfectly clear. You are playing the song and providing feedback on the note chart; you respond with constructive criticism on how the tempo map matches up, if the notes are well placed, etc. Once again, you do NOT tell somebody that, "well, this only has guitar, so I don't think it's really supposed to go on the RBN, sorry ^^."
davidshek;2877613 said:That's exactly right. DanB91, if you had planned on being a peer reviewer so you could try to Reject songs that you don't like, please don't be a peer reviewer.
DanB91;2876549 said:Many people might think a plain guitar solo won't cut it for the standards RBN is trying to hold. I wouldn't and I am seriously thinking of reviewing songs myself.
DanB91;2878996 said:I have another question, if someone wants to be cute and post up a "song" that is 30 secs long and has one note, should that pass through peer review?
AKALink;2878098 said:As a Guitar Hero III loading screen once said "People don't want to pay money to hear you jam".
gomakyle25;2886595 said:I read everything there is about RBN. ANd I am hyped, but, do you have to pay to post songs? Or is the 99/YR to review?