HelloMaster;3550455 said:Understood. Need better software and harder working testers. Thanks.
ethicalpaul;3550451 said:It's the maximum.It's hard enough to properly test/review a 6 minute song. I pity the poor fool who puts the first 10 minute song up.And greater than 10 minutes? There aren't enough hours in the day.
broncosfan06;3550497 said:there is one 10 minute song up..........but i cant for the life of me remember what it was......i remember them talking about how they had to cut it down to 10 min........i remember it had possibly the most insane drums ive ever seen.....i just cant remember what it was lol
T-Hybrid;3550504 said:Maybe you should sign up and volunteer your time if it's so easy. :rolleyes:
HelloMaster;3550518 said:I never said it was easy, and I didn't say the current testers didn't work hard. But ethicalpaul's reasoning against 10+ minute songs is not one of practical ability, it's simply one of effort.If the only difference between preparing a five-minute song and a 15-minute song is the time it takes to do it, then an excuse made for that reason is a lazy one. I ain't sayin' it's not justified, and I ain't sayin' it's not reasonable, I'm just saying it's lazy.Now the first part, the software limitations, that's understandable. I wish Harmonix would invest in software that allowed an audition mode to function past 10 minutes. That really doesn't seem out of line to me.
HMXHenry;3550587 said:I can tell you're going to be really popular in this peer driven user generated content initiative.
HelloMaster;3550518 said:I ain't sayin' it's not justified, and I ain't sayin' it's not reasonable, I'm just saying it's lazy.
HelloMaster;3550600 said:For every person telling you "good job", you need another person telling you "do better". This is how we improve.
Ehfahq;3550603 said:You just called testers lazy.
Ehfahq;3550603 said:Thats only true if you actually give constructive criticism. Which so far you have been unable to do.You just called testers lazy.
HelloMaster;3550607 said:I called testers who wouldn't be willing to chart songs beyond 10 minutes lazy, and I still believe that's the truth.
T-Hybrid;3550611 said:Seriously, quit while you're ahead. At this rate you're "advice" won't be helping anybody because most of the board will put you on their ignore lists by the end of the day.
HelloMaster;3550617 said:Ahead? Have you been reading this board? I've never been ahead! I was behind from my first comment!
HelloMaster;3550617 said:Ahead? Have you been reading this board? I've never been ahead! I was behind from my first comment!Well, maybe second.
SirDavidTLynch;3550624 said:It's not that much of a blow; only three of the 1100 or so songs on the main Rock Band Platform go over the limit, two of which are from full albums and could probably be edited down a bit if they absolutely had to. 10 minutes is more than enough time.
SirDavidTLynch;3550624 said:10 minutes is more than enough time.
HelloMaster;3550636 said:It's really not.