Cipher_Peon;4506242 said:Also, is there a reason why the sample of the 2nd one is just an incomplete preview of the song instead of the whole thing? Just wondering.
lvmathemagician;4507019 said:Anything with keys?
Bront20;4507403 said:Is there any chance you could mention:1) What instruments the track has (harmonies and keys in particular)2) What platforms a song is on if it's on outside of the 360?3) RBN2 or RBN1It might help folks find the songs and/or request them.
kingtonyx;4508218 said:Not going to lie, I check this thread every day to see if my song comes up on the randomizer >_>
FairwoodStudios;4508972 said:Steam Powered Giraffe - Electricity is In My Soul
FlyGuyLXI;4509012 said:How can you compare that to Abney Park?
FairwoodStudios;4507574 said:Recommended If You Like: Example
FairwoodStudios;4506502 said:Recommended If You Like: Liquid Tension ExperimentRecommended If You Like: Old 97's
FairwoodStudios;4506967 said:Recommended If You Like: Mumford & Sons, Delta Spirit
SheSaidSheSaid;4509088 said:Yeah some of these "recommended if you like" are about as obscure as the bands in question. Will you forgo them if your random song generator comes up with Seether/Creed/Evanescence/Drowning Pool/Finger Eleven?
SheSaidSheSaid;4509319 said:Thank you for not taking my remark as a personal slight. I think 'popular' would be better than 'accurate' for the comparisons, if you had to choose. Isn't the point to give people something to latch onto? Maybe I'm the only person in the world who hasn't heard of Abney Park or Mumford & Sons (sorta doubt it, though), but that really gives precisely zero new information. Of course the "sample the track" link is all we really need, but you've kinda got to cater to the ignorant here. Maybe give 3-4 artists for the comparisons to increase the odds that one sticks ('a course, the problem with that is that the comparisons would become less strong with more artists involved, but I think that's a minor concern).