rdblackb1983;4934479 said:in RB2 you could spell words on certain T-shirts and put symbols and other graphics on several of the guitars. I really loved this feature in RB2 and need to make sure it's available in RB3 before I try and buy. Will I be satisfied if I buy RB3?
TheHundredDollarHeadache;4934528 said:I have always thought RB3 fell short of the standard RB2 in aesthetics overall, and have complained about it since release. As such, I am not exactly neutral on this topic, so take my words with a grain of salt.
peterock2007;4935492 said:These are not the RPG you are looking for.
TheHundredDollarHeadache;4935497 said:RPGs aren't the only games that good aesthetics can improve.
peterock2007;4935500 said:Absolutely correct, but for every game there reaches a good enough point. Where the need to improve non gameplay effects is outweighed by the cost. RB3 more than reaches that point of equity.
peterock2007;4935500 said:Take any one your point of your complaints, compare the plus/minus of changing that with cost of changing it and see how many are still relevant.
peterock2007;4935500 said:I’m surprised that you aren’t one of those people that need to dress in costume irl in order to enjoy playing this game. Or are you?
TheHundredDollarHeadache;4935590 said:RB3's instrument (not vocals) engines are pretty much good enough and can do with just minor tweaks, leaving more developer time for the little things.It appears that your "good enough" for aesthetics is quite a bit lower than mine, and that's okay.
TheHundredDollarHeadache;4935590 said:By the way, if you're really that un-interested in the characters, why did you click on a thread about them? If it's really just to mess with me, that I can understand, because it seems to be your thing.
TheHundredDollarHeadache;4935590 said:Actually, lots of my complaints tend to have quick fixes. That's why I complain.
peterock2007;4935629 said:I really meant for the majority of rb3 gamers, not my own personal opinion. The Recordettes aren't a huge population are they? I don't ever remember your threads having too many harmony parts.
peterock2007;4935629 said:I totally wouldn't do that... Right?
peterock2007;4935629 said:Your fixes might be "quick" but that's unrealistic to say unless you've been inside the code looking at all their modules. $50,000 isn't cheap not to mention the man hours you pay the developers to implement and test your quick fixes.
TheHundredDollarHeadache;4935658 said:Even if RB3 looks good enough, I think many players would prefer RB2's stage show over RB3's.
TheHundredDollarHeadache;4935658 said:...I see what you did there with that last line.
TheHundredDollarHeadache;4935658 said:I remember you popping up in the last animation thread (which was also started by a non-Recordette).I'm a train wreck and you can't help but look.
TheHundredDollarHeadache;4935658 said:I gave up hope for a patch a long time ago, and have held out for RB4, with the new console generation being my hope.