leftover_crack;858477 said:well he wanted to be woody guthrie, he even had people call him woody and woody guthrie was the original punk so to an extent he was punk
Chief Stubbs;858485 said:Ok, sorry NX. Anyway...Wow, crack, you're the one calling Bob Dylan punk? Have you ever heard a punk song? Have you ever heard a Bob Dylan song?
leftover_crack;858530 said:well i wasn't saying his music is punk rock i was saying he was a punk which is what this thread is asking
NX013;858419 said:I think he is
Gargoyle2500;858973 said:Do I sense trolling?
King_Nuthin;858800 said:I know this is a joke thread, but I agree with the concept that an artist who doesn't perform punk music can still be punk. There is punk rock, and there is punk. Bob Dylan may or may not be punk, but he most definitely isn't punk rock. Conversely there are artists that play punk rock music that don't have an ounce of punk in them.
CM_Drunk;878565 said:I dont like the theory that if a musician is non conformist that means he is a "punk".
King_Nuthin;879369 said:I never used the words non-conformist. But there is a punk ethos. I think Bob Dylan is a reach, but that doesn't mean the idea is invalid.I've been into punk for 22 years now and the "this is/this isn't" punk has been going on far longer than I've been around and is stupider than ****. I only chimed in because I think both sides in this debate are talking out of their asses.
xerichx07;879603 said:Is this a joke thread?
Chief Stubbs;879396 said:You're one to talk.
King_Nuthin;879773 said:As if I need you for validation.
CM_Drunk;880317 said:Who? ME?
m00p;881003 said:No, the OP. He's been posting these type of threads non-stop. He's like the next Stewie..