Rockbandfan23467;1747209 said:You aren't gonna nominate him for the next leftover_crack, are you a21?
a21schizoidman;1747255 said:anywaysin my opinionWings > the BeatlesJet, Junior's Farm, Maybe I'm Amazed, Hi Hi Hi are imho, better than most Beatles songs
Gowienczyk;1747259 said:Yeah, Jet is a nice tune; Jellyfish covered that and I love that cover. /irrelevantopinion
Rockbandfan23467;1747185 said:Here's an explination from someone who shares my opinion:
instantdeath999;1747807 said:Well, I think the Pixies made great music, as well as being highly influential. Back to the Beatles thing, I think there is definitely enough material to fill a game. By far, the biggest problem is the guitar, although I would not be the least bit opposed to them charting piano/synth/organ/sitar, or whatever else. In fact, I pretty much expect sitar to be charted.What I'm concerned about is the masters. I had no idea stuff before The White Album was usable... but they did get Roy Orbison. Of course, I do believe their later stuff work better, but Twist and Shout, Hard Days Night, Revolution, Taxman, and many other pre-white album songs are pretty much essential. The drums will actually be fun, I believe. About on the level of AC/DC. Ringo just mostly keeps the beat, but he will throw in a fill or two. Bass should be pretty fun, and vocals are a no brainer. Guitar could be a bit stale on the majority, but they do have the option of charting other things. I guess it's the polar opposite of Guitar Hero Metallica, then. The Beatles will be an all around easy game, not counting vocals (I can see songs like Yer Blues being absolute nightmares on vocals... the pitch changes constantly. Think Bob Dylan)... Metallica will have a pretty ridiculous difficulty curve.
Fizzeler;1747818 said:The Beatles is full of classics Metallica will be full of extreme metal songs
Alright_Computer;1747982 said:Metallica has never been anything close to extreme metal. Extreme metal is stuff like death and black metal.
instantdeath999;1748074 said:That's definitely debatable. It can actually be argued that Thrash metal was the first sub-genre of Extreme metal. Though it would definitely be the least "extreme" sub-genre, with the possible exception of power metal.
Alright_Computer;1748094 said:That's true for the harder thrash songs, but I wouldn't consider anything by Metallica, especially stuff like the Black Album and Load/Reload, to be extreme metal.
Rockbandfan23467;1748112 said:But those aren't Thrash.
instantdeath999;1748150 said:I'm no expert, but I've always been under the impression the main sub-genres of extreme metal are Thrash, Death, and Black, with Power and Doom being debatable.
Gowienczyk;1748171 said:Extreme Metal really isn't a genre, it's just used by ridicilous people. Every person I've talked to who has knowledge doesn't use the term.
back_blows;1748172 said:Doom is definitely debatable, but you could draw connections between Doom and the other extreme sub-genres. Power, at least to me, was on the other end of the spectrum and had more in common with Traditional Heavy and NWOBHM.
Gowienczyk;1748189 said:Power is just traditional heavy metal taken to the next level.Heavy Metal part 3, ergo.
Quinarvy;1748869 said:Opinon:There are two many subgeneres of genres, that in their own right, are subgenres.
SevinWoohoo;1748894 said:The Beatles aren't that great.People who automatically don't like bands just because of their genre/ Last.Fm tags should be castrated.Di'Anno was Maiden's best singer.
a21schizoidman;1748902 said:we may have another L_O nom!
SevinWoohoo;1748925 said:1. I'm not a Communist2. I don't like Ska3. I can spell.